Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary
This occupation overlaps heavily with what AI already does.
AI is already used, successfully, for a large share of this occupation's core activities. That doesn't schedule a layoff; it schedules a redesign. The people who direct AI through these tasks will set the pace for everyone else.
Where this occupation sits among all 785 measured. Bands are quintiles of the real distribution. Applicability measures task overlap with observed AI usage. It is not a probability of job loss.
What this job involves
Teach courses in environmental science. Includes both teachers primarily engaged in teaching and those who do a combination of teaching and research.
Where AI overlaps this work, activity by activity
The occupation's most important work activities (O*NET weights, normalized to this set), each with its measured AI performance across 200,000 real conversations: how often AI is used for it, how well it completes it, and how much of the activity it covers.
| Work activity | Share of role | AI performance |
|---|---|---|
| Assess student capabilities, needs, or performance. | 16.5% | Not observed 0.00 |
| Maintain current knowledge in area of expertise. | 14.9% | High overlap 0.61 |
| Advise others on educational or vocational matters. | 13.7% | High overlap 0.70 |
| Supervise personnel activities. | 11.5% | Not observed 0.00 |
| Teach academic or vocational subjects. | 8.5% | High overlap 0.62 |
| Prepare informational or instructional materials. | 6.2% | High overlap 0.73 |
| Evaluate programs, practices, or processes. | 5.5% | High overlap 0.61 |
| Develop educational programs, plans, or procedures. | 5.5% | Not observed 0.00 |
| Maintain operational records. | 5.1% | Not observed 0.00 |
| Write material for artistic or commercial purposes. | 4.7% | High overlap 0.71 |
| Present research or technical information. | 4.0% | High overlap 0.75 |
| Purchase goods or services. | 3.8% | Moderate 0.52 |
"Not observed" is a measurement, not missing data: that activity does not meaningfully appear in the usage sample. AI performance = completion × scope × coverage (user-goal view), 0–1.
What drives this score: the biggest AI-overlapped activity in this role is maintain current knowledge in area of expertise; the most important activity AI is not observed doing is assess student capabilities, needs, or performance. The plan below is built around exactly that split.
High exposure playbook: own the tools, own the sign-off.
Next 30 days
- Adopt before you're outpaced. Pick your highest-overlap activity, Maintain current knowledge in area of expertise, and run it through a current AI tool this week. Learn where it's genuinely good and exactly where it breaks.
- Start an error log. Every AI mistake you catch is evidence for the reviewer role this occupation is drifting toward, and your case for owning it.
- Audit your week. Split your tasks into 'AI can draft it' vs 'a human must own it'. The second list is your future job description.
Next 90 days
- Become the sign-off. Volunteer to define how AI output gets checked in your team: quality bars, review steps, accountability. The person who writes the checklist doesn't get replaced by it.
- Shift visible value to the resilient column. Push more of your time into work like Assess student capabilities, needs, or performance, the activities AI is not observed doing, and make sure your manager sees the shift.
- Ship one workflow. Combine AI plus your judgment into a repeatable process that makes you measurably faster than peers. Speed with quality is the currency now.
The longer game
- Reposition your title around judgment. In Education & Library, the durable roles concentrate direction, review, client trust and accountability. Move your CV language, and your actual duties, there before the market forces it.
- Check the adjacent moves below. Several nearby roles share most of your activities with materially lower exposure; a sideways step early beats a forced one later.
- Keep receipts. Document outcomes you drove that AI couldn't have: the negotiation saved, the error caught, the client kept. That portfolio is your moat.
- AI applicability score and per-activity metrics: Tomlinson, Jaffe, Wang, Counts & Suri, Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations, Microsoft Research 2025 (arXiv:2507.07935), data CC BY 4.0.
- Occupation description and activity structure: O*NET 30.0 Database, USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0.
- Bands, personalization weights and action plans are JobRiskAI editorial layers; method and limitations on the methodology page.